The
proliferation of hardware and software can be described the improvement,
increase in availability, and the distribution of technology required for
hardware and software to work. In recent years, the proliferation of hardware
and software has evolved in such a way that it has revolutionised the way that
producers, writers and composers have made music. It has also changed the way
that consumers listen to music and opened doors for consumers to be more free
with their creativity and actually allow the everyday listener to producer
their own version of a song to suit their taste.
This is known as prosumerism and
it is on the rise as a result of the changes to hardware and software. It is
clear that the proliferation of hardware and software has brought many changes
to the music industry. But whether this has improved production practises or
simply watered them down to a level of ease for anyone to use, is what I will
address in this essay. Personally, I believe that the proliferation of hardware
and software has brought positive improvements to music production practises
for both the producer and the consumer.
The development of production practises has
been a direct result of the industrial evolution when the middle class was
created and with it, a new era of music production. During the 1940s when the
electric guitar started to gain popularity, children began to break away from traditional
styles of music such as classical to explore blues and rock music with their
friends. The electric guitar was very successful and led to the production of a
new sales industry of music devices for example guitar pedals, digital and
analogue effect processors, synthesizers, midi modules and more. Since this
major industrialization of additional music equipment, there has been an
improvement in the quality of home music production tools, that have reached
unimaginable heights. These modern tool allow anyone with work ethic, talent
and vision to create hit sounds from their bedroom on something as common as a
laptop or an iPad. The iPad has been
touted as a great media consumption device, but critics have continued to knock
its ability to be a productivity tool.
Front
man and songwriter of popular band Gorillaz, Damon Albarn reveals that he has
been recording the next Gorillaz album on his iPad. "I've made it on an
iPad--I hope I'll be making the first record on an iPad. I fell in love with my
iPad as soon as I got it, so I've made a completely different kind of record.”
Jesse Terry, development manager of DAW software Ableton Live, believes the key
to Ableton`s and electronic music`s success is the drag and drop software
concept “This means you can easily sequence tracks, add distortion, delays and
echo effects to a track, quickly and in real time.”
During
the 1990s, larger studios were the only parties that could afford to buy
high-end recording and production equipment, but now the recent proliferation
of hardware and software means technology is now so compact and affordable,
meaning producers don’t need large studios to gain access to essential tools of
electronic music. Matthew Derbyshire, a product manager for audio engineering
company Novation, says “ The Studio itself is changing. The new
semi-professional studio is now contained within a bedroom. As most of the
large, expensive studios collapsed, bedroom studios have blossomed thanks to
cheaper technology.” Amateur producers with no experience or fancy equipment
now have access to an unlimited amount of innovative recording, manipulation
and production essentials at low cost from their own homes. Electronic music is
being produced more quickly and often than ever.
“For
programming production, you now only really need a laptop. All the sounds, bar
vocals and guitar riffs, you can generate inside of the computer,” says
Derbyshire. The success of computer generated music is down to the development
of MIDI (Musical Instrument Digital Interface) which is a communications
messaging protocol, which allows a computer to digitally interact with a
musical instrument. Next came DAWs (Digital Audio Workshop) which is basically
a visual programming environment for audio.
However,
others may disagree with the statement in question and argue that the
proliferation of hardware and software has not led to improvements in
production practises but has instead diminished the quality of production
practises and there has been a notable decrease in the quality of sounds
produced. Many would argue that new production practises are taking the heart
and passion out of a once professional and expensive market whereas now we take
for granted how hard producers had to work before iPads and laptops existed.
Raw tracks that demonstrated real talent is rare and nowadays we are listening
to fake music that has been copied and changed to suit a prosumers taste.
Hardly anything we hear nowadays is original and refreshing. Old practises are
now out of fashion. Traditional methods cutting tape and splicing tracks are
almost non-existent. Many expert producers have lost their faith in the music
industry because of its new production practises and many have now retired or
moved on to other things.
Delia
Derbyshire who was a composer of electronic music was famous for her methods of
recycling everyday sounds to create tunes of music that have become iconic for
example The Doctor Who theme song. She vanished from the music industry in the
1970s after the creation of the modern synthesizer. This electronic musical
instrument that closely resembles a keyboard, generates electric signals that
are converted into different sounds. The availability of modern technology
means that prosumers are using unprofessional methods to create sounds that are
of lower quality than music heard in the 1970s, before the introduction of
cheap and accessible hardware.
This means there is now a collection of low
quality songs that overshadow the unique aspect of songs produced with proper
high quality equipment. Modern compact synthesizers are unbelievably expensive
for example OP-1 All in One Portable Synthesizer is priced at £849.99 on
Amazon, which is one of the lowest prices you would pay for a modern
synthesizer. These prices of hundreds of pounds are enough to deter anyone from
making music, whereas in the 1960s all you needed was a cassette with a
recording of a particular song and only one machine that could change the
speeds, reverse or forward the track and splice parts of the song to give birth
to a completely new song.
So
in conclusion, I believe that the proliferation of hardware and software has
been beneficial to the music industry and has improved production practises.
Although there are multiple downsides to this new technology I think it has
been more of a help than it has been a setback. I also believe that the
majority of modern music fans will agree that the availability of new
technology has positively impact production practises and is allowing us to
evolve and move forward.
Comments
Post a Comment